9/10/2012 10:29:02 PM
2
9/10/2012 10:29:05 PM
there are a multitude of reasons to expect foul play, beginning with the hilariously inept 9/11 commissionthe hard part about discussing any of this with people is because 75% call you an idiot and move on (as if they've done the research themselves), 20% employ constant straw man arguments based on what other crackpots believe, and maybe 5% will carry on a legitimate discussion. it's as if the topic is off-limits for speculation.the occam's razor argument is dismissive garbage, because there have been plenty of instances where mind-boggling conspiracy theories have turned out to be true.
9/10/2012 10:37:21 PM
so you are saying there is a plausible chance that full demolition charges were set on all 3 towers, plus the side of the Pentagon, in coordination w/ agents posing as arab terrorists that then flew planes into all 3 structures, and a 4th that was derailed (i hope they got the charges out of that missed target quickly enough! or maybe they intentionally crashed to throw us off the trail!), all of this perpetrated by the US government?
9/10/2012 10:43:37 PM
i know on the internet its easy to sound dismissive/sarcastic, so please take the following as sincere:
9/10/2012 10:45:31 PM
9/10/2012 10:54:18 PM
^well say what you DO believe. I've said multiple times that other lesser scenarios are far more probable, especially something as simple as the gov't not telling us how much they knew/who knew before hand. That would be a far stretch from a conspiracy theory though, more like business as usual.if you agree that my straw man scenario is completely implausible, then we agree w/ each other and shouldnt argue. but we also disagree w/ the OP b/c if one tower is controlled demo, they all have to be.[Edited on September 10, 2012 at 11:03 PM. Reason : a]
9/10/2012 11:00:09 PM
at the very least, there is much more than what the public has been fed, and what is being withheld is either very embarrassing or implicating. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Commission_Report#Criticism
9/10/2012 11:18:16 PM
i mean, in this day and age, that is hardly surprising, its barely even news, much less a conspiracy theory.i mean you can guarantee that the gov't didnt tell all the details w/out even rising to wrongdoing. there were surely classified details they withheld. Saying they withhold more than necessary to protect certain parties is hardly a reach[Edited on September 10, 2012 at 11:27 PM. Reason : a]
9/10/2012 11:25:28 PM
How big was WTC 7 (dimensions), and how long after the first tower was hit by the first plane did it come down?How many persons (highly trained explosives experts) would need to be involved in setting up the explosives? How long (hours) would they need to get it all ready to bring down?
9/11/2012 12:12:12 AM
9/11/2012 7:57:25 AM
Prove to me this was a controlled demolition, and I will hand you 20 bucks. Don't use google or Wikipedia, 100.It can't be done for one of two reasons:1. It wasn't a conspiracy, it actually happened.Or2. There is no physical, chemical, financial or forensic evidence to support testimony made by credible persons inside and outside of the "conspiracy."[Edited on September 11, 2012 at 8:19 AM. Reason : Spelling champion ]
9/11/2012 8:18:05 AM
hey adultswim, there's a home for you hereGo there, and never return.[Edited on September 11, 2012 at 8:52 AM. Reason : .]
9/11/2012 8:46:43 AM
9/11/2012 9:00:35 AM
I'm amazed that people still believe the purpose of the media is to inform, the purpose of government is to protect, and the purpose of school is to educate. If you hold all of these false beliefs, you're going to accept any narrative, no matter how absurd it is. You live in a world where blatant falsehoods have to be held as truth.
9/11/2012 9:30:28 AM
Can we all at least agree that flight 93 was most likely shot down by us fighter jets?
9/11/2012 10:28:54 AM
9/11/2012 1:07:04 PM
^^since the passengers of 93 had enough time to learn about the other hijackings, a passenger revolt doesn't seem implausible. but then again, neither do fighter jets.
9/11/2012 1:10:39 PM
9/11/2012 1:48:59 PM
CONSPIRACY THEORY?!¡OLE!
9/11/2012 1:55:08 PM
9/11/2012 2:09:51 PM
I know you are but what am I?Last one to post wins.
9/11/2012 2:21:19 PM
The only response Joshua has to any logical and philosophical arguments is claiming fallacies in the other person's ideas.
9/11/2012 2:32:07 PM
If you're not going to do your homework then why I should I bother explaining it to you?
9/11/2012 2:33:11 PM
You don't do your homework at all. What you're doing is accusing me of absolutely what you don't do.
9/11/2012 2:34:14 PM
I can't believe you all are wasting your time with this shit.How about a day of silence in this thread for the thousands that died on this day.
9/11/2012 2:36:50 PM
9/11/2012 2:37:34 PM
I'm sorry it's too complicated for you to understand how I worded that sentence to be an insult to you.
9/11/2012 2:41:11 PM
This entire conversation is miles above your head.
9/11/2012 2:42:55 PM
says the man with no substance to any of his comments.
9/11/2012 2:44:22 PM
I've already made it clear:If you're not going to do your homework then why I should I bother explaining it to you?
9/11/2012 2:45:45 PM
GeniuSxBoY is a bizarro world version of cleverbot.
9/11/2012 2:46:33 PM
I watched that documentary on first page, it was horrible. However, I think anyone who doesn't accept that the truth was obscured by the manufacture of myth and legend meant to highlight personal heroism and martyrdom must be a bit naïve.
9/11/2012 2:49:51 PM
9/11/2012 2:51:26 PM
The fuck are you people doing in Chit Chat????
9/11/2012 2:57:18 PM
Homework? You posted some pretty pictures and some unrelated youtube videos. You're only in this thread to troll and call me names because you're offended by the number of times I've proven you wrong in other threads.Anyway, I'm not interested in responding to any of your insults because they are not productive in any way, shape, or form in any intellectual conversation. Intellectual conversations stimulate questions, insults only damper the flames on eliminating ignorance. If you're not interested in participating in the discussion, please don't join in.
9/11/2012 3:00:16 PM
The sound of defeat.
9/11/2012 3:01:40 PM
lolmessage_topic.aspx?topic=629326&page=3#15511177]
9/11/2012 3:03:02 PM
9/11/2012 3:05:51 PM
Red sharpie + "NO" + a lot of Xs + circles = TRUTH!
9/11/2012 3:11:00 PM
9/11/2012 3:14:40 PM
9/11/2012 3:16:58 PM
Also here is my reasoning on why passengers didn't crash flight 93. If they fought the hijackers and gained control of the plane, why crash it instead of trying to land? If they revolt and fail, the terrorists are still going to try and complete their objective (which was pretty obviously not crashing a plane in a barren field).I know why the government would want to put a story out saying some red blooded americans saved a lot of lives by crashing that plane, because it sounds a whole lot better than ”hey we shot down this plane to save a bunch of people in washington”
9/11/2012 3:29:10 PM
can someone embed a video of building 7 falling? or is it in that jesse ventura vid?
9/11/2012 3:48:17 PM
^^Assuming the pilots were killed, I'm not sure the odds of there being someone else on a plane that knows how to fly
9/11/2012 3:52:24 PM
9/11/2012 3:54:37 PM
9/11/2012 4:02:39 PM
9/11/2012 4:39:01 PM
if you think it's absurd that the government would plan acts of terrorism and blame it on foreign enemies, you are wrong.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods]
9/11/2012 4:56:54 PM
Prepare for 3 pages of proof!
9/11/2012 5:30:33 PM