^ Fair enough, but these folks disagree:California Nurses Association/NNOC Issues Policy on H1N1 Flu Vaccination: Encourage, Don't Mandatehttp://tinyurl.com/yb2v9se
10/14/2009 12:23:39 PM
Good for them. If they dont vaccinate, then their company can disagree with keeping them around. I know in your retard brain you're probably trying to equate "madatory vaccines for healthcare workers" to "if you work anywhere in healthcare doing anything related you will be required by law to get a vaccine". What rational people are saying is that in any environment where there are sick people (hospitals, dr. offices, etc...) who would potentially have problems fighting the flu, its a-ok for the facility to make mandatory vaccines a job requirement. Patient care > job security.
10/14/2009 12:30:17 PM
10/14/2009 12:33:50 PM
^^ Dude, STFU calling me a "retard," you doofus. I never indicated that private health-care employers didn't have the right to make H1N1 vaccinations mandatory. I suggested that they not do so--and the California Nurses Association agrees with me, not you.Go argue with your cat.^ OPINION: Don't force medical pros to get H1N1 vaccineOctober 3, 2009 By GEORGE J. ANNAS George J. Annas is a professor of health law, bioethics and human rights at Boston University School of Public Health, and author of 'The Rights of Patients.'http://www.newsday.com/opinion/opinion-don-t-force-medical-pros-to-get-h1n1-vaccine-1.1496620[Edited on October 14, 2009 at 12:38 PM. Reason : .]
10/14/2009 12:37:14 PM
hooksaw I'm just curious: do you have any identifiable talents?
10/14/2009 12:43:42 PM
^^ umm... how is that in any way a response to what I posted, retard?^ he's a 40-something year old former prison guard who is back in college majoring in "liberal studies." What talents would you think he has?The most productive thing i've seen him do is post pics of scantily clad women[Edited on October 14, 2009 at 12:46 PM. Reason : ]
10/14/2009 12:43:45 PM
^^ and ^
10/14/2009 12:45:25 PM
Let's put it another way: what are you supposed to be good for?
10/14/2009 3:27:34 PM
Obama Declares Swine Flu a National Emergency Published: October 24, 2009 Filed at 11:23 a.m. ET
10/24/2009 12:05:00 PM
OH NO THE SKY IS FALLING!!!
10/24/2009 1:34:08 PM
the H1N1 will probably kill more healthy people than swine flu will.
10/24/2009 3:41:35 PM
^^ it's just a formality, dipshits. It doesn't mean they expect us all to go running around like chickens with their head's cut off"a proclamation that would allow medical officials to bypass certain federal requirements. Officials described the move as similar to a declaration ahead of a hurricane making landfall."^ what?
10/24/2009 4:04:50 PM
oops, I meant to say the vaccine will kill more healthy people than the H1N1 flu will.
10/24/2009 6:02:42 PM
We have 1 thousand deaths from the swine flu. We have about 30k deaths each year from the regular flu. I suppose we need to get used to these "national emergencies" for the next 4 yrs.
10/24/2009 6:08:15 PM
How dare he lay the groundwork for Federal assistance. I demand a Katrina-like response on every national problem![Edited on October 24, 2009 at 6:17 PM. Reason : .]
10/24/2009 6:16:46 PM
^^Do you genuinely believe this is political?TELL US WHAT YOU KNOW, SUPERIOR DOCTOR MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
10/25/2009 1:38:53 AM
10/25/2009 2:06:02 AM
I didnt say it was political, its just dumb.My aunts basement flooded over the weekend. I hear Obama is going to declare Pennsylvania a national disaster area for flooding tommorrow. Ok agent, I think it will be less than 30k. It still has a very low mortality rate. You said so yourself without knowing it.[Edited on October 25, 2009 at 9:42 AM. Reason : .]
10/25/2009 9:36:51 AM
Vaccinations should be mandatoryperiod
10/25/2009 9:44:47 AM
and birth control.period
10/25/2009 10:07:04 AM
H1N1 Vaccine Shortages Create Panic, WorryHealth and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius Urges Americans to be PatientOct. 26, 2009
10/27/2009 2:04:08 PM
10/27/2009 2:06:28 PM
he inherited this flu vaccine shortage, worse since the last vaccine shortage.
10/27/2009 2:07:46 PM
Man, it’s a good thing that the flu vaccine isn’t being left in the hands of the free market – we might have the same horrible production and distribution bottlenecks that we run into with Coke, pizza, books, and pajamas – you can’t find those things anywhere. And, hey, on the bright side, socialized medicine is coming!http://tjic.com/
10/27/2009 3:55:26 PM
^Just curious, where did the example of "pajamas" come from? It's hardly an extremely-highly-demanded product that absolutely everyone thinks they need to get as soon as they start wanting it (unlike coke and pizza and beer... because really "books" is just a silly example -- Americans don't read )
10/27/2009 3:59:49 PM
^^^^ What, for simply reporting that Obama declared swine flu a "national emergency"? How could they not report that? And there's this:What a difference five years makes on flu vaccine shortage 10/26/09
10/28/2009 3:28:56 AM
okay, hooksaw. please tell us:- how it's obama's fault that there's been a novel genetic sequencing of dna creating a pandemic virus around the world.- how it's obama's fault that this novel 2009 H1N1 Influenza Virus had no known previous incarnation to base a vaccine on.- how it's obama's fault the global community of microbiologists, virologists and geneticists still don't have a magical crystal ball to see in the future.and will you bother to note the fact that the shortage 5 years ago was due to gross failures in the logistical planning for the procurement and distribution of normal seasonal influenza virus, aggravated by incompetent political appointments by the administration to key posts?I didn't think so.Seriously, do you really get your scientific information from political hacks? are you ever going to finish your degree in "Liberal Studies"? Just how long has it been, now? go on, please continue to be a shill about your liberal media bias, but please do kindly shut the fuck up about scientific issues you know nothing about because all you're doing here is propagating misinformation that actually has a potential to harm and kill people.[Edited on October 28, 2009 at 4:21 AM. Reason : ]
10/28/2009 4:04:50 AM
10/28/2009 4:43:08 AM
Could we have this thread consolidated with the "climate change is a media fabrication" thread and the "evolution is a media fabrication" thread and any other asinine threads that question good science with anecdotes and shitty logic?
10/28/2009 10:19:24 AM
^ 1. No.2. Science is never wrong, right?3. This isn't about science--it's about politics.
10/28/2009 3:08:52 PM
If the price paid to the producers was higher, which would be a political decision at this point, then more would have been produced. [Edited on October 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM. Reason : .,.]
10/28/2009 4:15:16 PM
God I wish talentless political dipshits like hooksaw would just stay away from science altogether
10/28/2009 4:19:59 PM
10/28/2009 10:26:39 PM
^ Incorrect.^^ And I wish know-it-alls like you, schmoe, and others would quit acting like you have any idea what you're talking about. Are you a scientist, McDouche? Do you have any specific knowledge of vaccine production? Do you have anything to offer here other than pompous shitty remarks?If you don't like my threads, you don't have to post in them, doofus. Just stay the fuck out.In any event, there is a faster way to make vaccine. But as I indicated:
10/29/2009 2:39:57 AM
^^ "science" is often wrong. the difference between science and political hacks hanging out in a second-tier liberal studies program, is that science will admit it's wrong when presented with evidence that disputes the current hypothesis in play.[Edited on October 29, 2009 at 2:49 AM. Reason : ][Edited on October 29, 2009 at 2:50 AM. Reason : ]
10/29/2009 2:41:52 AM
10/29/2009 2:43:46 AM
^ 1. Bush was mistreated in comparison to Obama--it's a fact.2. I took a class--and I know people! --joe_salk.3. You have no knowledge of my accomplishments and they are many. 4. And this. . .
10/29/2009 2:54:37 AM
lol, hooksaw
10/29/2009 10:07:26 AM
10/29/2009 11:50:26 AM
^ No. He's a liar--among other things--joe_salk is just pissed that Obama sucks. Get back on topic or GTFO.
10/29/2009 1:54:06 PM
10/29/2009 8:46:59 PM
oh cool. here comes the hooksaw-burro tagteam. now the ignorance rollin' in this thread really won't be stopped.*sigh*i'm sure someone's tried to explain it here before, and i'm sure you clowns ignore any "science" that isn't delivered from Hannity or Limbaugh or Beck. But for the benefit of the casual observer, let's try it again:the 2009 Novel H1N1 Influenza virus, is not a seasonal flu variant. Novel means new. means never been seen before. it's a quadruple reassortment of avian, human and swine flu viruses. very few people under 60 have any antibodies to this virus. this means that a similar virus hasn't been seen on the face of this planet in probably 50 years or so.viruses mutate. the 2009 Novel H1N1 virus could mutate at any time into something potentially more deadly. the fact that it's an extremely virulent strain -- the fact that it is a PANDEMIC -- means that there is even more opportunity for this virus to mutate because there are so many hosts where it can mix things up.[Edited on October 30, 2009 at 1:59 AM. Reason : ]
10/30/2009 1:41:26 AM
^ The Obama administration shouldn't have promised what they couldn't deliver and you know it. Of course there are legitimate reasons this delay happened--but there is no excuse for the false promises. [Edited on October 30, 2009 at 2:07 AM. Reason : .]
10/30/2009 1:59:57 AM
okay. if that's your single point we're to distill out of all this, then i agree with you in principle. it isnt the administrations fault that the vaccine manufacturers promised they could deliver 'X' units of vaccine by such-and-such a date, and then failed to deliver.but because the administration repeated the manufacturers' promise and made it their own, now they are entangled in the failure of the manufacturers and perceived as being partially culpable. it's a noob error, but one completely unrelated to anything the administration can effect. i work in medical device manufacturing, and i've seen manufacturers and 3rd party vendors make all sorts of promises that are business critical -- and are realistically able to be fulfilled -- but then something outside their control fucks up, and the manufacturing target slips, and there ain't a damn thing anyone can do about it. not the president, not the pope, not the janitor who mops the bathroom floor.but if this is what you're setting your sights on to hit obama with... well, you're really stretching. it's like you promising your wife that the car will be fixed by the weekend because the best mechanic in the city has assured you it would be fixed. then the mechanic calls on Friday afternoon and says something weird has happened and the car wont be fixed for a couple weeks. And your wife blames you, and goes and tells everyone how you're a worthless husband and you have a small dick. [Edited on October 30, 2009 at 2:37 AM. Reason : ]
10/30/2009 2:31:17 AM
^
10/30/2009 2:46:18 AM
man, you really don't have a grasp of the technical issues at all, do you? i know it's easy for you to ignore the facts and just twist it to fit your preconceived ideological agenda, but the reality doesn't match your particular worldview.1. President Obama conveyed what was believed to be a realisitic assessment by the vaccine manufacturers. they didnt deliver. experienced people in the medical industry -- hell, in any manufacturing arena -- get burned on this sort of thing all the time.2. it's a global pandemic. as a population-based epidemic study, this has a real possibility of becoming a very serious threat. the longer we wait to innoculate the majority of the population, the more the probability of a catastrophic outcome continues to increase. now, is the probability of catastrophe "small?" i dont' know. how small does it have to be before it becomes "too small". how much does "too small" vary when the result could be tens or hundreds of thousands of deaths that will be weighted towards children and teenagers?3. you can't just "decide" to develop human vaccines "faster" no matter how much money you have to throw at it. the timeframe for major process changes is YEARS. likely at least a decade.1. there are huge differences between the current failure to quickly develop and distribute a vaccine for a NOVEL virus never seen on the planet before, and the distribution failure of the Bush admin in 2003 to adequately stock well-known and easily prepared SEASONAL vaccines.2. all media ever does is sensationalize. it's how they pay the bills. did you just start watching TV? And anyhow, like i said, the 2009 Novel H1N1 Influenza has the very real possibility of becoming a very serious threat. or it might just dissipate like the Y2K scare. the point is, WE DON'T KNOW. we CAN'T know. specific genetic mutations can not be predicted. only various probabilities can be discussed, and there are far too many potential outcomes to devote resources to preparing for any one of them.[Edited on October 30, 2009 at 3:21 AM. Reason : ]
10/30/2009 3:07:08 AM
^ You crack me up. You act like you're so fucking smart, but my undergrad degree is in business administration--with a heavy focus on operations management. Let's review the sheer ignorance you've displayed here, shall we?
10/30/2009 3:27:57 AM
okay, douchebag, i see you 'bout to sprain those eyeballs again, so i'mma make this quick.your "Theory of Constraints" is a marginal system developed by some guy in the 1980's (around the time you got your undergrad), that he tries to sell to companies. it's not taught in any MBA program that I'm aware of, unless to mention it in passing as being one of many perrenial "fad business philosophies" that make the rounds at the various dog-and-pony shows. PPF? yeah I learned about that and other clever things like "Supply and Demand" and "Diminishing Returns" in sophomore macroeconomics.the problem here, cupcake, is that the FDA doesnt give a good god damn about your PPFs or your operational constraints.furthermore, every single one of those companies you talk about being able to develop vaccines quicker are so far from being able to produce human vaccines, they havent even gotten PMA status from the FDA. they're a bunch of venture capital-funded gene jockeys playing foosball and drinking free energy drinks, and they're a LOOOONG way from ever being production-ready.but yes, I will agree the quote given in the article is correct:
10/30/2009 3:46:48 AM
10/30/2009 4:19:17 AM
^wouldn't that make it Clinton's fault, as well as Bush's fault?
10/30/2009 1:21:48 PM