its a white person holding the sign. doesn't count

3/19/2012 10:08:34 AM

3/19/2012 12:54:18 PM

I wouldn't mind seeing a debate on the constitution between the obgyn and the constitutional law professor

3/19/2012 1:02:19 PM

I'd absolutely love to see that. Obama spent a lot of time learning about the Constitution, presumably so he could effectively shit all over it.

3/19/2012 1:38:00 PM

Great Article about Republicanism

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/reawakening-liberty/2012/mar/19/ron-pauls-caucus-strategy-authentic-republicanism/

Quote :

"TAMPA, March 19, 2012—Give yourself a test. Without doing a web search or whipping out that pocket U.S. Constitution that a wild-eyed Tea Partier handed you, fill in the blank in the following sentence: The U.S. Constitution guarantees to every state in the union a _____form of government. If you are like ninety percent of the American electorate, you answered “democratic” and you were wrong. The answer is “a republican form of government.” There is a drastic difference between the two and one would think that the Republican Party would know it. Instead, they are identical to their rivals in not only ignoring the distinction but promoting democracy instead. In a democracy, the will of the majority is the law. Fifty-one percent of the vote empowers the winners to exercise any power they wish. Not so in a republic. The reason the founders constructed a constitutional republic was to protect Americans from democracy. That may sound like sacrilege to most 21st century Americans, but it’s true. James Madison called democracy “the most vile form of government.” Thomas Jefferson said that when majorities oppress an individual they “break up the foundations of society.” Benjamin Franklin mused that democracy was like “two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for dinner.” Republicanism is the logical form of government for conservatives. Conservatism at its best protects property rights from an unchecked majority plundering the individual. Liberalism at its best protects property rights from the wealthy conspiring with the government to plunder the masses. At their worst, both conservatism and liberalism legitimize plunder; the former for the few, the latter for the many. Ron Paul’s presidential campaign strategy is rooted in republicanism. He has deliberately focused his efforts on the states that hold caucuses instead of primaries because caucuses do not let the majority rule unchecked. Instead of merely pulling a few levers behind a curtain, caucus participants must complete a multi-tiered process that occurs for months after the popular vote before being chosen for the national convention. Who can doubt that these delegates are more informed than the typical primary voter? The essence of republicanism is for reason to triumph over the transient passion of the majority. Paul’s platform likewise represents what is best about conservatism. Without exception, it protects the individual from oppression by the majority. He is the only Republican presidential candidate that has actually said the words “role of government” during any debate. That’s because he is the only candidate that seems to recognize that the government’s role is limited; that even a majority vote cannot sanction it to exercise power beyond those limits. Throughout all of human history, conservatives have defended this principle against the ungoverned passion of the majority. Yet, conservatives today sound just like liberals when they decry Paul’s supporters using the republican nature of the caucuses to overturn the decisions of uninformed majorities. Their opposition to both Paul’s platform and his political strategy begs the question: Does the Republican Party still believe in a republican form of government? Do they still believe that the power of the majority has limits? Or are they just Democrats with a different supporter base? George W. Bush never once referred to the United States of America as “a republic.” He consistently referred to it as “a democracy” and like Woodrow Wilson claimed to be defending democracy all over the world. If he was representative of what the Republican Party now stands for, then how is it substantively different from the Democratic Party? These same questions apply to the issues. If the Republican Party truly favors the big government alternatives to Ron Paul, candidates who all supported the expansion of the federal government in the past and who refuse to commit to any meaningful cuts now, then what is the debate about? The federal government doesn’t need a manicure. It needs reconstructive surgery. Make that deconstructive surgery. You don’t turn $1.5 trillion deficits into surpluses by tweaking the way that federal departments are managed. You do so by completely eliminating departments and redefining the role of government. Only Ron Paul is proposing to do so. If there is anything left of what made the Republican Party different from the Democrats, they should support both Ron Paul’s platform and his political strategy. Tom Mullen is the author of A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America."

[Edited on March 19, 2012 at 3:12 PM. Reason : c]

3/19/2012 3:12:26 PM

Quote :

"caucus participants must complete a multi-tiered process that occurs for months after the popular vote before being chosen for the national convention. Who can doubt that these delegates are more informed wealthy with greater leisure time than the typical primary voter?"

3/19/2012 4:40:41 PM

Quote :

"I'd absolutely love to see that. Obama spent a lot of time learning about the Constitution, presumably so he could effectively shit all over it. "

I believe Obama is a constitutionalist, but I fear there is something in the shadows that is making him do this.

If there were any indication from his past that he was against the constitution before his election, I'm pretty sure the internet would have found it by now.

That isn't the case. He is squeaky clean.

When 1+1 = 3, there must be a hidden variable 1+x+1=3, that makes the equation makes sense.

What is the missing variable x?

[Edited on March 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM. Reason : .]

3/20/2012 12:28:09 AM

Quote :

"I wouldn't mind seeing a debate on the constitution between the obgyn and the constitutional law professor"

yeah, i'd love to see ron paul pwn the fuck out of obama, too.

3/20/2012 12:53:27 AM

^^http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MRykTpw1RQ

3/20/2012 12:55:07 AM

Quote :

"What is the missing variable x?"

In the equation you provided? x=1

3/20/2012 1:07:46 AM

Proof mainstream media is fraudulent.


http://youtu.be/02se7dGIKos

3/20/2012 1:07:58 AM

Quote :

""What is the missing variable x?" In the equation you provided? x=1"

x could equal y+z or a+b+c or a+y+z+g

3/20/2012 1:10:33 AM

if the image doesn't show: http://ronpaulrevolution.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/illinois-early-results1.png






ILLINOIS ELECTION RESULTS A DAY EARLY.


This enough proof of election fraud yet?! Or are you still protecting the mainstream media?

[Edited on March 20, 2012 at 1:35 AM. Reason : .]

3/20/2012 1:34:37 AM

Quote :

"This is somewhat embarrassing, isn’t it?"

3/20/2012 1:41:53 AM

good thing I saved it... Sorry the watermark covers the date but I assure you it says 3/20/2012 12:01AM





another link:






another link:



http://www.sociallyuncensored.eu/forums/threads/2012-elections-are-fixed-proof.13200/

[Edited on March 20, 2012 at 1:54 AM. Reason : .]

3/20/2012 1:53:16 AM

3/20/2012 2:11:52 AM

Click here to sign a petition for the removal of Eugene Dokes and Bryan Spencer (the guy who cancelled the Missouri caucus with intent to defraud voters)

video of caucus: http://youtu.be/odsgXbS5jio
video of caucus: http://youtu.be/cogkHLVqM8Q

petition:
http://www.change.org/petitions/missouri-gop-remove-eugene-dokes-and-bryan-spencer-remove-eugene-dokes-and-bryan-spencer-from-their-positions#

3/20/2012 4:14:51 AM

This Ron Paul conspiracy has really inspired confidence in America for me. If we can get people of different backgrounds, creeds, races, ages and even political parties to come together in such a wide ranging conspiracy against one man who never had a real chance to win anyway, just imagine the possibilities!

Go America!

3/20/2012 8:01:33 AM

dont encourage him.

3/20/2012 8:09:36 AM

You're free not to believe but denial is devastating defense mechanism. Never has denial served a beneficial purpose.

3/20/2012 1:44:06 PM

Tell us again how every news article, poll, or vote that isn't delivered to you by dailypaul.com is counter-factual propaganda concocted by the vast, conspiratorial MSM.

3/20/2012 1:47:29 PM

How Ron Paul got -16,000 votes in the last election, and not corrected.


http://youtu.be/qwS4XMEr_qY

3/20/2012 1:48:09 PM

Quote :

"Tell us again how every news article, poll, or vote that isn't delivered to you by dailypaul.com is counter-factual propaganda concocted by the vast, conspiratorial MSM."

That's easy. Listen to each candidate's stance on the issues. Find out their history and background. Find out their trustworthiness, meaning, how long have they stood on an important issue without changing their mind.

If you don't agree with what Ron Paul says, you are not a supporter of the Constitution.
If you agree with anything that Romney, Santorum, or Newt says, you are not a supporter of the Constitution.

To make myself clear, you are not a champion of freedom, liberty, truth, fairness and justice for everyone.

3/20/2012 1:52:42 PM

Quote :

"If you don't agree with what Ron Paul says, you are not a supporter of the Constitution. If you agree with anything that Romney, Santorum, or Newt says, you are not a supporter of the Constitution. To make myself clear, you are not a champion of freedom, liberty, truth, fairness and justice for everyone."

Is this nigga serious or the most dedicated troll on this site?

3/20/2012 2:36:08 PM

I would put my life behind those words. I am that confident in them.
This is not a game or a joke.

3/20/2012 2:43:26 PM

^^don't give trolls a bad name like that

3/20/2012 3:00:27 PM

Ron Paul supporters are young white men who are scared of losing their privilege.

3/20/2012 3:36:36 PM

[quote]Ron Paul supporters are young white men who are scared of losing their privilege.


Nice, you see human rights as a privilege.

Very telling.

3/20/2012 3:39:34 PM

Do I really need to explain the concept of social privilege to you?

3/20/2012 3:40:59 PM

<imstoned420 logic>

a lot of obama supporters are black people who have low IQs and perform poorly scholastically

</imstoned420 logic>

[Edited on March 20, 2012 at 3:42 PM. Reason : 420 bitches]

3/20/2012 3:41:54 PM

^I don't support Ron Paul because he is a creationist. I know he wouldn't force it on the school boards etc, but he's a scientist...he should know better.

3/20/2012 3:42:54 PM

Quote :

"I don't support Ron Paul because he is a creationist. I know he wouldn't force it on the school boards etc, but he's a scientist...he should know better."

Who do you support?

3/20/2012 3:53:15 PM

Quote :

"Ron Paul supporters are young white men who are scared of losing their privilege."

The fuck is this?

Let's just assume what you're saying isn't completely retarded. How are the political alternatives any better or worse for maintaining "privilege"? Do you really fucking think Obama or Romney are any threat to "white privilege"?

[Edited on March 20, 2012 at 3:56 PM. Reason : ]

3/20/2012 3:54:36 PM

Breathing American air on american soil must be a privilege, too.

3/20/2012 3:59:49 PM

Yo god, word is bond, GeniuSxBoY is an American hero, god.

pack_bryan, step your game up, son. This cat is straight up embarrassing you.


/ghostface

3/20/2012 4:57:45 PM

I think geniusboy has a point. Since on average white people score higher on SATs and make on average an extra few dollars per month..... therefore all white people hate black people and want them to 'hold them back'. Just look at those white people and all those anti-black programs.


I watched BET the other day btw. therefore i'm not racist too. lol

[Edited on March 20, 2012 at 4:59 PM. Reason : ,]

3/20/2012 4:58:45 PM

^^The irony in your post is amazing.

[Edited on March 20, 2012 at 4:59 PM. Reason : .]

3/20/2012 4:59:29 PM

[Edited on March 20, 2012 at 5:07 PM. Reason : ]

3/20/2012 5:00:50 PM

I have a question for you, JesusHChrist. What are you fighting me for? What is your mission in trying to suppress my quest for everyone's freedom, liberty, and prosperity?



[Edited on March 20, 2012 at 5:03 PM. Reason : clarification]

3/20/2012 5:02:05 PM

I'm not fighting you. Keep fighting the good fight. I salute you.

3/20/2012 5:06:55 PM

No, for real. Are you against truth, honesty, and integrity?



[Edited on March 20, 2012 at 5:10 PM. Reason : .]

3/20/2012 5:10:19 PM

yes

3/20/2012 5:11:26 PM

Tell me exactly what you stand for.

3/20/2012 5:12:10 PM

jesus, what kind of vehicle do you own or operate

3/20/2012 5:12:36 PM

I'm also against happiness, puppies, and double-scoop ice cream cones.

3/20/2012 5:13:01 PM

I drive a cement truck, bryan. Why do you ask?

3/20/2012 5:13:31 PM

thank you for the quick response mr lord jesus christ of arimathea...

do you use your cement truck for recreational purposes or business?

3/20/2012 5:18:49 PM

I hope you see the irony in you fighting against me when I believe in what you believe.

3/20/2012 5:21:23 PM

Why, a little bit of both, bryan. While my primary occupation is basic carpentry, sometimes I like to go to the local park and fill the sand boxes with concrete. It's fun.

3/20/2012 5:22:45 PM

excellent. what type of mileage do you get on that concrete mixer truck?

3/20/2012 5:31:56 PM